Thomas B Gatje

Male, Age 52 Ridgefield , Connecticut

Thomas B Gatje is a 52 years old male, born on Wednesday, 21st of July 1971. He will turn 53 on July 21, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 72 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Thomas is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 10, 2010.

Overview of Thomas B Gatje

Age: 52

Gender: male

Birth year: 1972

Lives in: Ridgefield

Thomas B Gatje's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 10, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Scotts Ridge Middle School 2

Voter ID: 004081049

Congressional District: 004

House District: 111

Senate District: 026

Thomas B Gatje Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Thomas B Gatje

56 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
56 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
56 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
57 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1816
No known party affiliation
57 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1816
No known party affiliation
64 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
64 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
72 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
72 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
73 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1816
No known party affiliation
73 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1816
No known party affiliation
78 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
78 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation
78 Spireview Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-1817
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $100,411

Net Worth: $1,068,169

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.