Anton Vuljaj

Male, Age 36 Stonington , Connecticut

Anton Vuljaj is a 36 years old male, born on Tuesday, 29th of September 1987. He will turn 37 on September 29, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 11 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Anton is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 6, 2010.

Overview of Anton Vuljaj

Age: 36

Gender: male

Birth year: 1987

Lives in: Stonington

Phone number: 860-961-3401

Anton Vuljaj's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 6, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Stonington Fire House

Voter ID: 004080505

Congressional District: 002

House District: 043

Senate District: 018

Anton Vuljaj Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Anton Vuljaj

7 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
7 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-0000
No known party affiliation
8 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1010
No known party affiliation
8 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1010
No known party affiliation
9 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
9 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
9 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-0000
No known party affiliation
11 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
11 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
11 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
11 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
12 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1010
No known party affiliation
15 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
15 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1009
No known party affiliation
15 Oak Drive, Stonington , Ct 06378-1047
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $53,415

Net Worth: $1,357,091

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.