Dulce J Roy

Male, Age 60 Waterbury , Connecticut

Dulce J Roy is a 60 years old male, born on Monday, 21st of October 1963. He will turn 61 on October 21, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 30 Vail Street 6, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3760 and is not affiliated with any political party. Dulce is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 4, 2009.

Overview of Dulce J Roy

Age: 60

Gender: male

Birth year: 1963

Lives in: Waterbury

Dulce J Roy's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 4, 2009

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 03

District: 071

Polling place: Tinker School

Voter ID: 004064234

Congressional District: 003

House District: 071

Senate District: 015

Dulce J Roy Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Dulce J Roy

30 Vail Street 8, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3760
No known party affiliation
30 Vail Street 34, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3760
No known party affiliation
30 Vail Street 1, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3760
No known party affiliation
44 Vail Street, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
44 Vail Street, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
44 Vail Street 3, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
46 Vail Street 3, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
46 Vail Street 3, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
46 Vail Street 2, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
46 Vail Street 3rd, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
46 Vail Street, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3711
No known party affiliation
51 Vail Street, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3735
No known party affiliation
51 Vail Street, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3735
No known party affiliation
51 Vail Street, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3735
No known party affiliation
51 Vail Street 3, Waterbury , Ct 06708-3735
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $18,338

Net Worth: $1,271,502

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.