Frank V Czelazewicz

Male, Age 32 Windsor, Connecticut

Frank V Czelazewicz is a 32 years old male, born on Tuesday, 20th of August 1991. He will turn 33 on August 20, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 21 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428 and is not affiliated with any political party. Frank is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 4, 2009.

Overview of Frank V Czelazewicz

Age: 32

Gender: male

Birth year: 1991

Lives in: Windsor

Frank V Czelazewicz's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 4, 2009

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: 330 Windsor Avenue

Voter ID: 004046202

Congressional District: 001

House District: 005

Senate District: 002

Frank V Czelazewicz Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Frank V Czelazewicz

11 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
11 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
15 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
15 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
15 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
20 Colton Street 1, Windsor, Ct 06095-3429
No known party affiliation
21 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
22 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3429
No known party affiliation
22 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3429
No known party affiliation
23 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
25 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
25 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
25 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3428
No known party affiliation
26 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3429
No known party affiliation
26 Colton Street, Windsor, Ct 06095-3429
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $29,481

Net Worth: $531,650

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.

View More Results for Czelazewicz