Shaheem Sanjay Richards

Male, Age 34 Stamford , Connecticut

Shaheem Sanjay Richards is a 34 years old male, born on Thursday, 7th of April 1988. He will turn 35 on April 07, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 637 Cove Road C3, Stamford , 06902-5405 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Shaheem is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 29, 2008.

Overview of Shaheem Sanjay Richards

Age: 34

Gender: male

Birth year: 1988

Lives in: Stamford

Shaheem Sanjay Richards's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 29, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Murphy School

Voter ID: 004015494

Congressional District: 004

House District: 148

Senate District: 027

Shaheem Sanjay Richards Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Shaheem Sanjay Richards

608 Cove Road, Stamford , 06902-6128
No known party affiliation
608 Cove Road, Stamford , 06902-6128
No known party affiliation
608 Cove Road, Stamford , 06902-6128
No known party affiliation
608 Cove Road, Stamford , 06902-6128
No known party affiliation
608 Cove Road, Stamford , 06902-6128
No known party affiliation
625 Cove Road 3, Stamford , 06902-6125
No known party affiliation
625 Cove Road, Stamford , 06902-6125
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road B4, Stamford , 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road A11, Stamford , 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road C17, Stamford , 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road A17, Stamford , 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road D10, Stamford , 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road B3, Stamford , 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road D5, Stamford , 06902-5443
No known party affiliation
637 Cove Road D13, Stamford , 06902-5408
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $35,269

Net Worth: $681,414

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.