Olga M Loarco

Female, Age 68 Stratford , Connecticut

Olga M Loarco is a 68 years old female, born on Sunday, 14th of August 1955. She will turn 69 on August 14, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 20 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031 and is not affiliated with any political party. Olga is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 28, 2008.

Overview of Olga M Loarco

Age: 68

Gender: female

Birth year: 1956

Lives in: Stratford

Olga M Loarco's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 28, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 100

Polling place: Second Hill Lane 120 21

Voter ID: 004000906

Congressional District: 003

House District: 120

Senate District: 021

Olga M Loarco Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Olga M Loarco

15 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2032
No known party affiliation
15 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-0000
No known party affiliation
20 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
20 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
20 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
20 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
20 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
35 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2032
No known party affiliation
35 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2032
No known party affiliation
40 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
55 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2032
No known party affiliation
55 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2032
No known party affiliation
60 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
60 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2031
No known party affiliation
75 Masna Place, Stratford , Ct 06614-2032
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $93,897

Net Worth: $1,317,095

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.