Loubna Ettaki

Female, Age 51 Hamden , Connecticut

Loubna Ettaki is a 51 years old female, born on Sunday, 15th of October 1972. She will turn 52 on October 15, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 925 Mix Avenue 3f, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Loubna is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 26, 2008.

Overview of Loubna Ettaki

Age: 51

Gender: female

Birth year: 1973

Lives in: Hamden

Loubna Ettaki's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 26, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 010

Polling place: Hamden Middle School

Voter ID: 003994692

Congressional District: 003

House District: 088

Senate District: 017

Loubna Ettaki Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Loubna Ettaki

905 Mix Avenue 1i, Hamden , Ct 06514-5109
No known party affiliation
905 Mix Avenue 2m, Hamden , Ct 06514-5109
No known party affiliation
905 Mix Avenue 1n, Hamden , Ct 06514-5109
No known party affiliation
905 Mix Avenue 2e, Hamden , Ct 06514-5109
No known party affiliation
905 Mix Avenue 2f, Hamden , Ct 06514-5109
No known party affiliation
905 Mix Avenue 2j, Hamden , Ct 06514-5109
No known party affiliation
905 Mix Avenue 2o, Hamden , Ct 06514-5109
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue 2j, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue T8, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue 3k, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue T4, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue 3d, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue 2f, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue T7, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation
925 Mix Avenue 1d, Hamden , Ct 06514-5116
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $22,038

Net Worth: $274,861

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.