Jacquelyn B Parks

Female, Age 34 Ansonia, Connecticut

Jacquelyn B Parks is a 34 years old female, born on Saturday, 16th of January 1988. She will turn 35 on January 16, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 477 Beaver St I 22, Ansonia, 06401-2070 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jacquelyn is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 6, 2008.

Overview of Jacquelyn B Parks

Age: 34

Gender: female

Birth year: 1988

Lives in: Ansonia

Phone number: 203-736-3789

Jacquelyn B Parks's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 6, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 01

District: 002

Polling place: Ward 2 Ansonia Armory

Voter ID: 003925890

Congressional District: 003

House District: 104

Senate District: 017

Jacquelyn B Parks Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jacquelyn B Parks

445 Beaver St A16, Ansonia, 06401-2069
No known party affiliation
445 Beaver St, Ansonia, 06401-2069
No known party affiliation
445 Beaver St E60, Ansonia, 06401-2069
No known party affiliation
447 Beaver St H13, Ansonia, 06401-2007
No known party affiliation
447 Beaver St Apt 241, Ansonia, 06401-2007
No known party affiliation
455 Beaver St F73, Ansonia, 06401-2007
No known party affiliation
455 Beaver St E70, Ansonia, 06401-2007
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St I24, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St G11, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St G3, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St G10, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St I23, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St I21, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St 19i, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation
477 Beaver St G1, Ansonia, 06401-2070
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $13,952

Net Worth: $954,991

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.