John Jerome Zack

Male, Age 54 Windsor, Connecticut

John Jerome Zack is a 54 years old male, born on Friday, 19th of January 1968. He will turn 55 on January 19, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 345 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. John is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 12, 2008.

Overview of John Jerome Zack

Age: 54

Gender: male

Birth year: 1968

Lives in: Windsor

John Jerome Zack's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 12, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Oliver Ellsworth School

Voter ID: 003894498

Congressional District: 001

House District: 060

Senate District: 002

John Jerome Zack Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for John Jerome Zack

335 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation
335 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation
335 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation
336 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2031
No known party affiliation
336 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2031
No known party affiliation
339 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation
344 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2031
No known party affiliation
345 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation
363 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation
363 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation
368 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2031
No known party affiliation
368 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2031
No known party affiliation
370 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2031
No known party affiliation
370 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2031
No known party affiliation
375 Palisado Avenue, Windsor, 06095-2021
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $11,553

Net Worth: $698,819

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.