Rohaan Iqbal

Male, Age 34 Hartford , Connecticut

Rohaan Iqbal is a 34 years old male, born on Saturday, 5th of November 1988. He will turn 35 on November 05, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 24 Park Place 17f, Hartford , Ct 06106-5008 and is not affiliated with any political party. Rohaan is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 25, 2018.

Overview of Rohaan Iqbal

Age: 34

Gender: male

Birth year: 1989

Lives in: Hartford

Rohaan Iqbal's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 25, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 011

Polling place: United Way Of The Capital Area

Voter ID: 003888658

Congressional District: 001

House District: 003

Senate District: 002

Rohaan Iqbal Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rohaan Iqbal

6 Park Place, Hartford , Ct 06106-5005
No known party affiliation
6 Park Place, Hartford , Ct 06106-5005
No known party affiliation
8 Park Place, Hartford , Ct 06106-5005
No known party affiliation
8 Park Place 2 Fl, Hartford , Ct 06106-1318
No known party affiliation
20 Park Place, Hartford , Ct 06106-5005
No known party affiliation
20 Park Place, Hartford , Ct 06106-5005
No known party affiliation
20 Park Place, Hartford , Ct 06106-5005
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place, Hartford , Ct 06106-5008
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place 5f, Hartford , Ct 06106-5008
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place 9j, Hartford , Ct 06106-5008
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place 21j, Hartford , Ct 06106-5029
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place 23h, Hartford , Ct 06106-5008
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place 21f, Hartford , Ct 06106-5008
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place 24 F, Hartford , Ct 06106-5030
No known party affiliation
24 Park Place 24f, Hartford , Ct 06106-5008
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $38,957

Net Worth: $644,466

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.