Betsie Baker

Female, Age 81 Enfield, Connecticut

Betsie Baker is a 81 years old female, born on Wednesday, 10th of February 1943. She will turn 82 on February 10, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 103 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2358 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Betsie is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 2, 2008.

Overview of Betsie Baker

Age: 81

Gender: female

Birth year: 1943

Lives in: Enfield

Phone number: 860-763-3493

Betsie Baker's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 2, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 358

Polling place: Enfield Municipal Annex

Voter ID: 003884595

Congressional District: 002

House District: 058

Senate District: 007

Betsie Baker Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Betsie Baker

99 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2361
No known party affiliation
99 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2361
No known party affiliation
100 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2364
No known party affiliation
100 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2364
No known party affiliation
100 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2364
No known party affiliation
101 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2358
No known party affiliation
102 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2364
No known party affiliation
104 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2364
No known party affiliation
104 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2364
No known party affiliation
104 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2364
No known party affiliation
105 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2358
No known party affiliation
105 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2358
No known party affiliation
107 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2361
No known party affiliation
107 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2361
No known party affiliation
109 The Laurels, Enfield, Ct 06082-2361
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $38,901

Net Worth: $1,440,308

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.