Nato Dawesgagua

Female, Age 53 Stamford , Connecticut

Nato Dawesgagua is a 53 years old female, born on Wednesday, 2nd of July 1969. She will turn 54 on July 02, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 54 Myrtle Avenue 2, Stamford , 06902-3900 and is not affiliated with any political party. Nato is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 25, 2008.

Overview of Nato Dawesgagua

Age: 53

Gender: female

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Stamford

Nato Dawesgagua's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 25, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Domus The Old Rogers School

Voter ID: 003865992

Congressional District: 004

House District: 148

Senate District: 027

Nato Dawesgagua Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Nato Dawesgagua

54 Myrtle Avenue 4, Stamford , 06902-3910
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 3, Stamford , 06902-3900
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 9, Stamford , 06902-3900
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 6, Stamford , 06902-3900
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 8, Stamford , 06902-3910
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 3, Stamford , 06902-3900
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 1, Stamford , 06902-3900
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 2, Stamford , 06902-3900
No known party affiliation
54 Myrtle Avenue 5, Stamford , 06902-3900
No known party affiliation
60 Myrtle Avenue 2 Fl, Stamford , 06902-3957
No known party affiliation
68 Myrtle Avenue, Stamford , 06902-3928
No known party affiliation
70 Myrtle Avenue, Stamford , 06902-3928
No known party affiliation
70 Myrtle Avenue, Stamford , 06902-3928
No known party affiliation
70 Myrtle Avenue, Stamford , 06902-3928
No known party affiliation
70 Myrtle Avenue, Stamford , 06902-3928
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $89,911

Net Worth: $308,563

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.