Janet L Rooks

Female, Age 94 Norwich, Connecticut

Janet L Rooks is a 94 years old female, born on Thursday, 15th of August 1929. She will turn 95 on August 15, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 36 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1561 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Janet is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 9, 2008.

Overview of Janet L Rooks

Age: 94

Gender: female

Birth year: 1929

Lives in: Norwich

Phone number: 860-204-0930

Janet L Rooks's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 9, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Samuel Huntington Elementary School

Voter ID: 003859764

Congressional District: 002

House District: 139

Senate District: 019

Janet L Rooks Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Janet L Rooks

29 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-0000
No known party affiliation
30 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
30 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
31 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
33 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1561
No known party affiliation
34 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1561
No known party affiliation
35 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1561
No known party affiliation
37 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
37 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
38 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
39 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
40 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
41 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
41 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation
44 Oxford Drive, Norwich, Ct 06360-1519
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $65,223

Net Worth: $1,101,311

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.