Julianna M Smith

Female, Age 36 Shelton, Connecticut

Julianna M Smith is a 36 years old female, born on Friday, 16th of January 1987. She will turn 37 on January 16, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 34 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2316 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Julianna is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 18, 2016.

Overview of Julianna M Smith

Age: 36

Gender: female

Birth year: 1987

Lives in: Shelton

Phone number: 203-383-0269

Julianna M Smith's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 18, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Shelton Intermediate School

Voter ID: 003815064

Congressional District: 004

House District: 113

Senate District: 021

Julianna M Smith Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Julianna M Smith

23 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2313
No known party affiliation
26 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2314
No known party affiliation
26 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2314
No known party affiliation
27 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2313
No known party affiliation
30 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2316
No known party affiliation
32 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2316
No known party affiliation
33 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2315
No known party affiliation
34 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2316
No known party affiliation
34 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2316
No known party affiliation
34 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2316
No known party affiliation
35 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2315
No known party affiliation
37 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2315
No known party affiliation
37 New Street, Shelton, Ct 06484-2315
No known party affiliation
41 New Street 3, Shelton, Ct 06484-2315
No known party affiliation
41 New Street Apt 2, Shelton, Ct 06484-2315
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $72,668

Net Worth: $616,906

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.