Yveline Georges

Male, Age 36 Stamford , Connecticut

Yveline Georges is a 36 years old male, born on Monday, 16th of November 1987. He will turn 37 on November 16, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 11 Duffy Street 2, Stamford , Ct 06902-5301 and is not affiliated with any political party. Yveline is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 6, 2007.

Overview of Yveline Georges

Age: 36

Gender: male

Birth year: 1988

Lives in: Stamford

Yveline Georges's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 6, 2007

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Murphy School

Voter ID: 003751942

Congressional District: 004

House District: 148

Senate District: 027

Yveline Georges Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Yveline Georges

6 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5330
No known party affiliation
6 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5330
No known party affiliation
8 Duffy Street 1fl, Stamford , Ct 06902-5330
No known party affiliation
11 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5301
No known party affiliation
11 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5301
No known party affiliation
11 Duffy Street 1, Stamford , Ct 06902-5301
No known party affiliation
13 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5301
No known party affiliation
29 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation
29 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation
29 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation
29 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation
29 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation
31 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation
31 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation
31 Duffy Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-5302
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $31,804

Net Worth: $1,245,741

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.