Jill M Chungphillip

Female, Age 66 New Haven , Connecticut

Jill M Chungphillip is a 66 years old female, born on Tuesday, 21st of May 1957. She will turn 67 on May 21, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 36 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jill is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 20, 2007.

Overview of Jill M Chungphillip

Age: 66

Gender: female

Birth year: 1957

Lives in: New Haven

Phone number: 203-676-7869

Jill M Chungphillip's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 20, 2007

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 027

Polling place: Mauro Sheridan Magnet School

Voter ID: 003742622

Congressional District: 003

House District: 092

Senate District: 010

Jill M Chungphillip Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jill M Chungphillip

22 Ruby Street 2 Fl, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
25 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1326
No known party affiliation
25 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1326
No known party affiliation
26 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
26 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
30 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
30 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-0000
No known party affiliation
36 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
42 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-0000
No known party affiliation
46 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
46 Ruby Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
46 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
46 Ruby Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1327
No known party affiliation
46 Ruby Street 1, New Haven , Ct 06515-1383
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $53,739

Net Worth: $989,716

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.