Sandra Perezsolla

Female, Age 55 Windsor, Connecticut

Sandra Perezsolla is a 55 years old female, born on Monday, 15th of January 1968. She will turn 56 on January 15, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 23 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014 and is not affiliated with any political party. Sandra is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 23, 2007.

Overview of Sandra Perezsolla

Age: 55

Gender: female

Birth year: 1968

Lives in: Windsor

Phone number: 860-298-9613

Sandra Perezsolla's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 23, 2007

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Oliver Ellsworth School

Voter ID: 003734331

Congressional District: 001

House District: 060

Senate District: 002

Sandra Perezsolla Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sandra Perezsolla

8 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation
8 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation
15 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014
No known party affiliation
23 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014
No known party affiliation
23 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014
No known party affiliation
30 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation
31 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014
No known party affiliation
31 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014
No known party affiliation
39 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014
No known party affiliation
46 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation
46 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation
54 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation
55 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2014
No known party affiliation
60 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation
60 Foster Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2013
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $111,373

Net Worth: $860,662

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.