Kaley Ripa

Female, Age 35 Wallingford, Connecticut

Kaley Ripa is a 35 years old female, born on Friday, 8th of April 1988. She will turn 36 on April 08, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 45 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Kaley is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 9, 2006.

Overview of Kaley Ripa

Age: 35

Gender: female

Birth year: 1988

Lives in: Wallingford

Phone number: 203-907-5699

Kaley Ripa's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 9, 2006

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Cook Hill School

Voter ID: 003676571

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

Kaley Ripa Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kaley Ripa

40 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4325
No known party affiliation
41 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
41 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
41 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
41 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
43 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
43 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
45 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
45 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
45 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
45 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
46 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4325
No known party affiliation
46 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4325
No known party affiliation
47 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation
47 Jones Road, Wallingford, Ct 06492-4324
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $88,509

Net Worth: $582,990

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.