Janel Joanne Kelly

Female, Age 35 Prospect , Connecticut

Janel Joanne Kelly is a 35 years old female, born on Monday, 30th of May 1988. She will turn 36 on May 30, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 54 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1742 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Janel is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 31, 2016. Our records show Frank J Kelly Iii (78) and Leslie C Kelly (66) as possible relatives.

Overview of Janel Joanne Kelly

Age: 35

Gender: female

Birth year: 1988

Lives in: Prospect

Phone number: 203-808-6850

Janel Joanne Kelly's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 31, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Community School

Voter ID: 003657269

Congressional District: 003

House District: 089

Senate District: 016

Janel Joanne Kelly Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Janel Joanne Kelly

50 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1742
No known party affiliation
50 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1742
No known party affiliation
53 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1743
No known party affiliation
53 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1743
No known party affiliation
53 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1743
No known party affiliation
53 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1743
No known party affiliation
53 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1743
No known party affiliation
55 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1743
No known party affiliation
55 Heritage Drive, Prospect , Ct 06712-1743
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Janel Joanne Kelly's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Prospect , Ct
Born on: Saturday, 4th of November 1944
Gender: Unknown
Prospect , Ct
Born on: Friday, 8th of March 1957
Gender: Unknown

Income

Salary: $44,499

Net Worth: $555,722

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.