Jill Stokes

Female, Age 54 Thomaston , Connecticut

Jill Stokes is a 54 years old female, born on Wednesday, 12th of November 1969. She will turn 55 on November 12, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 9 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jill is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 21, 2005.

Overview of Jill Stokes

Age: 54

Gender: female

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Thomaston

Jill Stokes's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 21, 2005

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Thomaston Opera House

Voter ID: 003639696

Congressional District: 005

House District: 076

Senate District: 031

Jill Stokes Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jill Stokes

3 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
3 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
4 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1933
No known party affiliation
4 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1933
No known party affiliation
9 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
9 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
15 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
16 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1933
No known party affiliation
16 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1933
No known party affiliation
19 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
23 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
23 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation
26 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1933
No known party affiliation
26 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1933
No known party affiliation
27 Warner Lane, Thomaston , Ct 06787-1932
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $98,586

Net Worth: $1,045,271

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.