1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06278 Ashford
  4. Deerfield Drive

Barbara Mathilde Renna

Female, Age 61 Ashford, Connecticut

Barbara Mathilde Renna is a 61 years old female, born on Wednesday, 31st of October 1962. She will turn 62 on October 31, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 29 Deerfield Drive, Ashford, Ct 06278-2005 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Barbara is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 31, 2005. Our records show Eugene Renna (63) and Jonathan Ambrose Renna (24) as possible relatives.

Overview of Barbara Mathilde Renna

Age: 61

Gender: female

Birth year: 1962

Lives in: Ashford

Phone number: 860-429-8763

Barbara Mathilde Renna's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 31, 2005

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Knowlton Memorial Hall

Voter ID: 003636526

Congressional District: 002

House District: 053

Senate District: 035

Barbara Mathilde Renna Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

29 Deerfield Drive, Ashford, Ct 06278-2005

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Barbara Mathilde Renna

Noah Gregory King(40)
6 Deerfield Drive, Ashford, Ct 06278-2006
No known party affiliation
Christine Grace Burinskas(34)
15 Deerfield Drive, Ashford, Ct 06278-2005
No known party affiliation
Douglas D Bailey Jr.(72)
15 Deerfield Drive, Ashford, Ct 06278-2005
No known party affiliation
Henry E Haeussler(82)
40 Deerfield Drive, Ashford, Ct 06278-2006
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 29 Deerfield Drive, Ashford, Ct 06278-2005

Related Persons

Barbara Mathilde Renna's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(63)
Ashford, Ct
Born on: Sunday, 8th of May 1960
Gender: Male
(24)
Ashford, Ct
Born on: Sunday, 24th of January 1999
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $110,355

Net Worth: $1,620,618

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.