Keiko L Acri

Unknown, Age 62 Waterbury , Connecticut

Keiko L Acri is a 62 years old unknown gender, born on Wednesday, 7th of June 1961. This person will turn 63 on June 07, 2025. Our records show this person currently resides at 162 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1142 and is not affiliated with any political party. Keiko is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 17, 2005.

Overview of Keiko L Acri

Age: 62

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1961

Lives in: Waterbury

Phone number: 203-565-2190

Keiko L Acri's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 17, 2005

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 03

District: 073

Polling place: Kingsbury School

Voter ID: 003627787

Congressional District: 005

House District: 073

Senate District: 015

Keiko L Acri Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Keiko L Acri

153 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
153 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
154 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1142
No known party affiliation
154 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1142
No known party affiliation
161 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
161 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
161 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
162 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1142
No known party affiliation
165 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
165 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
165 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1143
No known party affiliation
170 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1142
No known party affiliation
170 Leffingwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06710-1142
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $54,424

Net Worth: $410,583

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.