Khaleda Afroze

Female, Age 50 Danbury, Connecticut

Khaleda Afroze is a 50 years old female, born on Friday, 21st of September 1973. She will turn 51 on September 21, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 45 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473 and is not affiliated with any political party. Khaleda is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 13, 2005.

Overview of Khaleda Afroze

Age: 50

Gender: female

Birth year: 1973

Lives in: Danbury

Phone number: 203-743-5249

Khaleda Afroze's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 13, 2005

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 10

District: 006

Polling place: Park Avenue School Gym

Voter ID: 003626827

Congressional District: 005

House District: 110

Senate District: 024

Khaleda Afroze Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Khaleda Afroze

35 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
37 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
37 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
39 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
39 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
39 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
43 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
45 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
45 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
47 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
49 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
49 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6473
No known party affiliation
53 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6474
No known party affiliation
53 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6474
No known party affiliation
55 Linron Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-6474
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $15,339

Net Worth: $912,881

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.