Sharon B Askew

Female, Age 74 Ledyard, Connecticut

Sharon B Askew is a 74 years old female, born on Tuesday, 4th of October 1949. She will turn 75 on October 04, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 15 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Sharon is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 23, 2008.

Overview of Sharon B Askew

Age: 74

Gender: female

Birth year: 1949

Lives in: Ledyard

Phone number: 860-464-8967

Sharon B Askew's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 23, 2008

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Juliet Long School

Voter ID: 003588380

Congressional District: 002

House District: 042

Senate District: 019

Sharon B Askew Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sharon B Askew

3 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1208
No known party affiliation
3 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1208
No known party affiliation
4 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1207
No known party affiliation
5 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1208
No known party affiliation
11 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation
11 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation
13 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation
17 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation
17 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation
17 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation
17 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation
18 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1210
No known party affiliation
18 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1210
No known party affiliation
18 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1210
No known party affiliation
19 Garden Drive, Ledyard, Ct 06335-1209
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $32,280

Net Worth: $263,378

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.