Leith Niegowski

Male, Age 41 Windsor, Connecticut

Leith Niegowski is a 41 years old male, born on Saturday, 30th of October 1982. He will turn 42 on October 30, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 316 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2361 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Leith is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 5, 2010.

Overview of Leith Niegowski

Age: 41

Gender: male

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: Windsor

Phone number: 860-471-7296

Leith Niegowski's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 5, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Windsor Town Hall

Voter ID: 003576652

Congressional District: 001

House District: 015

Senate District: 002

Leith Niegowski Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Leith Niegowski

312 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2361
No known party affiliation
313 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
313 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
313 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
313 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
314 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2361
No known party affiliation
315 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
316 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2361
No known party affiliation
317 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
317 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
319 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
320 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2361
No known party affiliation
320 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2361
No known party affiliation
321 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2314
No known party affiliation
322 Dunfey Lane, Windsor, Ct 06095-2361
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $86,141

Net Worth: $248,642

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.