Eric J Coviello

Male, Age 41 Windsor Locks, Connecticut

Eric J Coviello is a 41 years old male, born on Thursday, 29th of July 1982. He will turn 42 on July 29, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 51 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2814 and is not affiliated with any political party. Eric is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 20, 2004. Our records show Laura J. Coviello (70) as possible relative.

Overview of Eric J Coviello

Age: 41

Gender: male

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: Windsor Locks

Phone number: 860-623-6109

Eric J Coviello's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 20, 2004

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Windsor Locks High School

Voter ID: 003567360

Congressional District: 001

House District: 060

Senate District: 007

Eric J Coviello Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Eric J Coviello

39 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2814
No known party affiliation
44 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2844
No known party affiliation
45 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2814
No known party affiliation
46 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2844
No known party affiliation
46 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2844
No known party affiliation
48 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2844
No known party affiliation
48 Gaylord Road A, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2844
No known party affiliation
54 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2844
No known party affiliation
54 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2844
No known party affiliation
55 Gaylord Road, Windsor Locks, Ct 06096-2814
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Eric J Coviello's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Windsor Locks, Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 31st of March 1953
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $69,567

Net Worth: $1,422,163

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.