Lori A. Ryffgoselin

Female, Age 64 Essex , Connecticut

Lori A. Ryffgoselin is a 64 years old female, born on Monday, 23rd of February 1959. She will turn 65 on February 23, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 15 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163 and is not affiliated with any political party. Lori is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 15, 2004.

Overview of Lori A. Ryffgoselin

Age: 64

Gender: female

Birth year: 1960

Lives in: Essex

Lori A. Ryffgoselin's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 15, 2004

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Essex Town Hall 01

Voter ID: 003480307

Congressional District: 002

House District: 036

Senate District: 033

Lori A. Ryffgoselin Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Lori A. Ryffgoselin

9 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163
No known party affiliation
10 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
10 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
11 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163
No known party affiliation
11 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163
No known party affiliation
14 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
14 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
18 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
18 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
19 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163
No known party affiliation
19 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163
No known party affiliation
20 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
20 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1165
No known party affiliation
21 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163
No known party affiliation
21 Rosewood Lane, Essex , Ct 06442-1163
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $98,564

Net Worth: $473,824

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.