Jill L Joyce

Female, Age 61 Stratford , Connecticut

Jill L Joyce is a 61 years old female, born on Friday, 7th of September 1962. She will turn 62 on September 07, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 540 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2416 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jill is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 30, 2012.

Overview of Jill L Joyce

Age: 61

Gender: female

Birth year: 1963

Lives in: Stratford

Jill L Joyce's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 30, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 090

Polling place: Bunnell High School 120 21

Voter ID: 003432256

Congressional District: 003

House District: 120

Senate District: 021

Jill L Joyce Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jill L Joyce

535 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2417
No known party affiliation
540 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2416
No known party affiliation
540 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2416
No known party affiliation
545 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2417
No known party affiliation
545 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2417
No known party affiliation
550 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2416
No known party affiliation
550 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2416
No known party affiliation
635 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2419
No known party affiliation
635 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2419
No known party affiliation
636 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2483
No known party affiliation
636 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2483
No known party affiliation
655 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2419
No known party affiliation
655 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2419
No known party affiliation
655 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2419
No known party affiliation
656 Robin Lane, Stratford , Ct 06614-2483
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $59,887

Net Worth: $470,480

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.