Natalia Moena

Female, Age 38 Stamford , Connecticut

Natalia Moena is a 38 years old female, born on Friday, 7th of June 1985. She will turn 39 on June 07, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 11 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Natalia is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 21, 2004.

Overview of Natalia Moena

Age: 38

Gender: female

Birth year: 1985

Lives in: Stamford

Natalia Moena's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 21, 2004

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 010

Polling place: Westover Magnet School

Voter ID: 003430008

Congressional District: 004

House District: 145

Senate District: 027

Natalia Moena Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Natalia Moena

11 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
11 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
12 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
12 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
12 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
12 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
16 Moore Street 1, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
16 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
19 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
19 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
19 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
19 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
19 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
20 Moore Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation
20 Moore Street A, Stamford , Ct 06902-4614
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $18,592

Net Worth: $1,508,740

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.