Amelia Patterson Fox

Female, Age 51 Ridgefield , Connecticut

Amelia Patterson Fox is a 51 years old female, born on Saturday, 25th of December 1971. She will turn 52 on December 25, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 130 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5821 and is not affiliated with any political party. Amelia is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 18, 2003. Our records show James Andrew Fox (53) as possible relative.

Overview of Amelia Patterson Fox

Age: 51

Gender: female

Birth year: 1972

Lives in: Ridgefield

Phone number: 203-431-8988

Amelia Patterson Fox's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 18, 2003

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: East Ridge Middle School 1

Voter ID: 003363300

Congressional District: 004

House District: 111

Senate District: 026

Amelia Patterson Fox Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Amelia Patterson Fox

122 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5821
No known party affiliation
123 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5820
No known party affiliation
123 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5820
No known party affiliation
124 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5821
No known party affiliation
124 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5821
No known party affiliation
127 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5820
No known party affiliation
127 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5820
No known party affiliation
138 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5821
No known party affiliation
138 Rising Ridge Road, Ridgefield , Ct 06877-5821
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Amelia Patterson Fox's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Ridgefield , Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 17th of February 1970
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $19,473

Net Worth: $351,909

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.