Sang Woo Han

Male, Age 56 Oxford , Connecticut

Sang Woo Han is a 56 years old male, born on Monday, 9th of January 1967. He will turn 57 on January 09, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 19 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1260 and is not affiliated with any political party. Sang Woo is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 2, 2003.

Overview of Sang Woo Han

Age: 56

Gender: male

Birth year: 1967

Lives in: Oxford

Phone number: 203-881-1050

Sang Woo Han's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 2, 2003

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Quaker Farms School

Voter ID: 003340246

Congressional District: 004

House District: 131

Senate District: 032

Sang Woo Han Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sang Woo Han

15 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-0000
No known party affiliation
16 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
17 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1260
No known party affiliation
17 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1260
No known party affiliation
18 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
18 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
18 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
19 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1260
No known party affiliation
20 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
20 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
21 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1260
No known party affiliation
21 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1260
No known party affiliation
22 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
22 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1261
No known party affiliation
23 Chauncey Drive, Oxford , Ct 06478-1260
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $81,645

Net Worth: $1,252,383

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.