1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06360 Norwich
  4. Stonecliff Lane

Rosemary Sileo

Female, Age 54 Norwich, Connecticut

Rosemary Sileo is a 54 years old female, born on Thursday, 27th of November 1969. She will turn 55 on November 27, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 9 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Rosemary is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 26, 2002. Our records show Vincent M Sileo (59) as possible relative.

Overview of Rosemary Sileo

Age: 54

Gender: female

Birth year: 1970

Lives in: Norwich

Rosemary Sileo's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 26, 2002

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: John B Stanton Elementary School

Voter ID: 003292093

Congressional District: 002

House District: 046

Senate District: 019

Rosemary Sileo Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

9 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rosemary Sileo

Kaitlyn Dakota Evans(30)
4 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432
No known party affiliation
Amanda L Mueller(47)
5 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432
No known party affiliation
Derek Smith(43)
5 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432
No known party affiliation
Josef D Chambor(37)
8 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432
No known party affiliation
Nathan Russell Thompson(21)
8 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432
No known party affiliation
Marjorie Laura Booth(91)
10 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 9 Stonecliff Lane, Norwich, Ct 06360-6432

Related Persons

Rosemary Sileo's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(59)
Norwich, Ct
Born on: Thursday, 5th of March 1964
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $93,385

Net Worth: $73,813

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.