Maribel Segui

Female, Age 44 New Haven , Connecticut

Maribel Segui is a 44 years old female, born on Friday, 27th of April 1979. She will turn 45 on April 27, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 88 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4538 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Maribel is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 23, 2001.

Overview of Maribel Segui

Age: 44

Gender: female

Birth year: 1980

Lives in: New Haven

Phone number: 203-278-3113

Maribel Segui's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 23, 2001

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 017

Polling place: Firehouse Woodward

Voter ID: 003254879

Congressional District: 003

House District: 097

Senate District: 011

Maribel Segui Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Maribel Segui

85 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
85 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
87 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
87 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
87 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
87 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
87 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
88 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4538
No known party affiliation
95 Pardee Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
95 Pardee Street 1 Fl, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
95 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
95 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
99 Pardee Street, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation
99 Pardee Street 13, New Haven , Ct 06513-4541
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $70,691

Net Worth: $860,094

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.