Emily W Rouleau

Female, Age 40 Manchester , Connecticut

Emily W Rouleau is a 40 years old female, born on Thursday, 7th of July 1983. She will turn 41 on July 07, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 43 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Emily is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 9, 2001.

Overview of Emily W Rouleau

Age: 40

Gender: female

Birth year: 1983

Lives in: Manchester

Emily W Rouleau's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 9, 2001

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Buckley School

Voter ID: 003235136

Congressional District: 001

House District: 012

Senate District: 004

Emily W Rouleau Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Emily W Rouleau

30 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3332
No known party affiliation
30 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3332
No known party affiliation
30 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3332
No known party affiliation
30 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3332
No known party affiliation
33 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
39 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
39 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
43 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
47 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
47 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
50 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3332
No known party affiliation
53 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
56 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3332
No known party affiliation
59 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation
59 Clyde Road, Manchester , Ct 06042-3331
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $22,697

Net Worth: $396,056

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.