Carclie Owens

Female, Age 88 Hamden , Connecticut

Carclie Owens is a 88 years old female, born on Monday, 10th of June 1935. She will turn 89 on June 10, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 70 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Carclie is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 26, 2001.

Overview of Carclie Owens

Age: 88

Gender: female

Birth year: 1935

Lives in: Hamden

Phone number: 203-787-4424

Carclie Owens's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 26, 2001

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Keefe Community Center

Voter ID: 003233886

Congressional District: 003

House District: 094

Senate District: 017

Carclie Owens Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Carclie Owens

63 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4817
No known party affiliation
64 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
64 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
64 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
67 Burke Street 2, Hamden , Ct 06514-4817
No known party affiliation
67 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4817
No known party affiliation
67 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4817
No known party affiliation
70 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
70 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
79 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4819
No known party affiliation
80 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
80 Burke Street 2, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
80 Burke Street 2fl, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
80 Burke Street 1, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation
80 Burke Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-4818
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $8,907

Net Worth: $957,650

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.