Larissa V Klymenko

Female, Age 62 Preston, Connecticut

Larissa V Klymenko is a 62 years old female, born on Sunday, 21st of May 1961. She will turn 63 on May 21, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 74 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8023 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Larissa is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 24, 2000.

Overview of Larissa V Klymenko

Age: 62

Gender: female

Birth year: 1961

Lives in: Preston

Phone number: 860-889-8191

Larissa V Klymenko's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 24, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Preston Plains Middle School

Voter ID: 003199140

Congressional District: 002

House District: 042

Senate District: 018

Larissa V Klymenko Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Larissa V Klymenko

69 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
70 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8023
No known party affiliation
70 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8023
No known party affiliation
71 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
73 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
73 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
73 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
74 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8023
No known party affiliation
75 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
75 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
78 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8023
No known party affiliation
78 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8023
No known party affiliation
79 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
79 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8038
No known party affiliation
80 River Road, Preston, Ct 06365-8023
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $94,246

Net Worth: $821,706

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.