Dana Lee Olivo

Female, Age 55 Meriden, Connecticut

Dana Lee Olivo is a 55 years old female, born on Thursday, 28th of March 1968. She will turn 56 on March 28, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 60 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Dana is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 18, 2000.

Overview of Dana Lee Olivo

Age: 55

Gender: female

Birth year: 1968

Lives in: Meriden

Phone number: 203-440-1935

Dana Lee Olivo's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 18, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 013

Polling place: Lincoln Middle School

Voter ID: 003171506

Congressional District: 005

House District: 083

Senate District: 013

Dana Lee Olivo Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Dana Lee Olivo

16 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
26 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
26 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
27 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
38 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
50 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
51 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
61 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
61 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
61 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
71 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
71 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
71 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
77 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation
77 Surrey Drive, Meriden, Ct 06451-2616
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $71,942

Net Worth: $114,488

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.