Jacqueline Marie Desagun

Female, Age 53 Bristol, Connecticut

Jacqueline Marie Desagun is a 53 years old female, born on Wednesday, 25th of December 1968. She will turn 54 on December 25, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 4 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jacqueline is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 17, 2019.

Overview of Jacqueline Marie Desagun

Age: 53

Gender: female

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Bristol

Jacqueline Marie Desagun's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 17, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 04

District: 077

Polling place: Bristol Eastern High School

Voter ID: 003168691

Congressional District: 001

House District: 077

Senate District: 031

Jacqueline Marie Desagun Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jacqueline Marie Desagun

4 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
4 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
8 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
8 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
9 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5358
No known party affiliation
9 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5358
No known party affiliation
9 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5358
No known party affiliation
14 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
14 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
21 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5358
No known party affiliation
22 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
22 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
26 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
26 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5357
No known party affiliation
27 Second Street, Bristol, 06010-5358
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $61,709

Net Worth: $1,242,480

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.