Jose J Diaz

Male, Age 45 Windham, Connecticut

Jose J Diaz is a 45 years old male, born on Tuesday, 9th of January 1979. He will turn 46 on January 09, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 325 Jeffrey Road C, Windham, Ct 06226-1810 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jose is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 10, 2000.

Overview of Jose J Diaz

Age: 45

Gender: male

Birth year: 1979

Lives in: Windham

Jose J Diaz's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 10, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 003160201

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Jose J Diaz Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jose J Diaz

322 Jeffrey Road E, Windham, Ct 06226-1814
No known party affiliation
322 Jeffrey Road F, Windham, Ct 06226-1814
No known party affiliation
323 Jeffrey Road D, Windham, Ct 06226-1815
No known party affiliation
323 Jeffrey Road C, Windham, Ct 06226-1815
No known party affiliation
324 Jeffrey Road E, Windham, Ct 06226-1841
No known party affiliation
324 Jeffrey Road D, Windham, Ct 06226-1841
No known party affiliation
324 Jeffrey Road E, Windham, Ct 06226-1841
No known party affiliation
325 Jeffrey Road E, Windham, Ct 06226-1810
No known party affiliation
325 Jeffrey Road Apt F, Windham, Ct 06226-1810
No known party affiliation
325 Jeffrey Road F, Windham, Ct 06226-1810
No known party affiliation
325 Jeffrey Road A, Windham, Ct 06226-1810
No known party affiliation
327 Jeffrey Road Apt D, Windham, Ct 06226-1809
No known party affiliation
327 Jeffrey Road E, Windham, Ct 06226-1809
No known party affiliation
327 Jeffrey Road F, Windham, Ct 06226-1809
No known party affiliation
328 Jeffrey Road C, Windham, Ct 06226-1843
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $118,398

Net Worth: $29,553

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.