Robert J Farler

Male, Age 41 Southington, Connecticut

Robert J Farler is a 41 years old male, born on Sunday, 15th of August 1982. He will turn 42 on August 15, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 46 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-0000 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Robert is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 15, 2000.

Overview of Robert J Farler

Age: 41

Gender: male

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: Southington

Phone number: 860-621-3284

Robert J Farler's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 15, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Kennedy School

Voter ID: 003142494

Congressional District: 001

House District: 081

Senate District: 016

Robert J Farler Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Robert J Farler

25 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7607
No known party affiliation
25 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7607
No known party affiliation
25 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7607
No known party affiliation
34 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7608
No known party affiliation
34 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7608
No known party affiliation
46 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-0000
No known party affiliation
56 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7608
No known party affiliation
56 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7608
No known party affiliation
56 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-0000
No known party affiliation
57 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7607
No known party affiliation
57 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7607
No known party affiliation
62 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-0000
No known party affiliation
62 Glenwood Park Road, Southington, Ct 06479-7608
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $66,722

Net Worth: $187,162

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.