Robert J Smith

Male, Age 87 Guilford , Connecticut

Robert J Smith is a 87 years old male, born on Wednesday, 17th of July 1935. He will turn 88 on July 17, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 140 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Robert is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 12, 2000.

Overview of Robert J Smith

Age: 87

Gender: male

Birth year: 1935

Lives in: Guilford

Phone number: 203-453-1150

Robert J Smith's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 12, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Abraham Baldwin School

Voter ID: 003140646

Congressional District: 003

House District: 098

Senate District: 012

Robert J Smith Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Robert J Smith

112 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
122 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
122 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
130 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
130 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
134 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
134 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
140 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
148 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
148 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
150 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
150 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
150 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
162 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation
162 Sconset Lane, Guilford , 06437-4802
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $75,502

Net Worth: $209,254

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.