Sharon L Cunha

Female, Age 70 Shelton, Connecticut

Sharon L Cunha is a 70 years old female, born on Sunday, 19th of July 1953. She will turn 71 on July 19, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 44 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346 and is not affiliated with any political party. Sharon is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 16, 2019.

Overview of Sharon L Cunha

Age: 70

Gender: female

Birth year: 1953

Lives in: Shelton

Phone number: 203-843-1874

Sharon L Cunha's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 16, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Long Hill School

Voter ID: 003121509

Congressional District: 004

House District: 122

Senate District: 021

Sharon L Cunha Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sharon L Cunha

38 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
38 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
40 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
40 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
41 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
42 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
42 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
44 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
45 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5346
No known party affiliation
52 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5347
No known party affiliation
52 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5347
No known party affiliation
53 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5347
No known party affiliation
53 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5347
No known party affiliation
54 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5347
No known party affiliation
55 Woodland Park, Shelton, Ct 06484-5347
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $38,104

Net Worth: $659,658

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.