Ann Marie Zinowich

Female, Age 72 Oxford , Connecticut

Ann Marie Zinowich is a 72 years old female, born on Monday, 30th of July 1951. She will turn 73 on July 30, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 28 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1154 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Ann Marie is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 4, 1999.

Overview of Ann Marie Zinowich

Age: 72

Gender: female

Birth year: 1951

Lives in: Oxford

Phone number: 203-881-1132

Ann Marie Zinowich's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 4, 1999

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Quaker Farms School

Voter ID: 003053036

Congressional District: 004

House District: 131

Senate District: 032

Ann Marie Zinowich Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Ann Marie Zinowich

23 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
23 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
25 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
25 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
25 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
27 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
27 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
28 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1154
No known party affiliation
29 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
29 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
31 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
33 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
33 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1152
No known party affiliation
36 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1154
No known party affiliation
36 Larkey Road, Oxford , Ct 06478-1154
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $81,905

Net Worth: $168,451

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.