Tracy Cifone

Female, Age 53 Burlington, Connecticut

Tracy Cifone is a 53 years old female, born on Wednesday, 22nd of July 1970. She will turn 54 on July 22, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 5 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302 and is not affiliated with any political party. Tracy is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 25, 1999.

Overview of Tracy Cifone

Age: 53

Gender: female

Birth year: 1970

Lives in: Burlington

Phone number: 860-673-6550

Tracy Cifone's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 25, 1999

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Town Hall

Voter ID: 003050676

Congressional District: 005

House District: 076

Senate District: 005

Tracy Cifone Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Tracy Cifone

3 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
3 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
3 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
4 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
4 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
4 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
6 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
6 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
9 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
9 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
10 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
10 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
10 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
11 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation
11 Wotton Lane, Burlington, Ct 06013-2302
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $97,866

Net Worth: $446,508

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.