Rex L Niswander

Male, Age 74 Greenwich , Connecticut

Rex L Niswander is a 74 years old male, born on Monday, 22nd of August 1949. He will turn 75 on August 22, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 22 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Rex is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 12, 2001.

Overview of Rex L Niswander

Age: 74

Gender: male

Birth year: 1949

Lives in: Greenwich

Phone number: 203-629-4926

Rex L Niswander's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 12, 2001

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Greenwich Town Hall

Voter ID: 002902384

Congressional District: 004

House District: 150

Senate District: 036

Rex L Niswander Adress & Maps

Show Map
Show Map

Mailing Address

22 Robertson Lane, Cos Cob, Ct 068072522

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rex L Niswander

14 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
14 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
15 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2523
No known party affiliation
15 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2523
No known party affiliation
16 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
16 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
20 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
24 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
26 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
26 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
30 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
30 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation
30 Robertson Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06807-2522
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $40,818

Net Worth: $1,441,833

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.