James M Better

Male, Age 61 Greenwich , Connecticut

James M Better is a 61 years old male, born on Monday, 18th of September 1961. He will turn 62 on September 18, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 7 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. James is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 19, 2000. Our records show Nancy M Better (59), Charles Edward Better (27) and Sarah Lauren Better (25) as possible relatives.

Overview of James M Better

Age: 61

Gender: male

Birth year: 1961

Lives in: Greenwich

Phone number: 203-629-3609

James M Better's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 19, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 011

Polling place: North Street School

Voter ID: 002879398

Congressional District: 004

House District: 151

Senate District: 036

James M Better Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for James M Better

4 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
4 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
5 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
5 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
6 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
6 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
6 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
12 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation
12 Dogwood Lane, Greenwich , 06830-3917
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

James M Better's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Greenwich , Ct
Born on: Friday, 21st of December 1962
Gender: Female
Greenwich , Ct
Born on: Friday, 11th of November 1994
Gender: Male
Greenwich , Ct
Born on: Wednesday, 26th of February 1997
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $66,303

Net Worth: $990,111

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.