Danielle J Ojjeh

Female, Age 52 Greenwich , Connecticut

Danielle J Ojjeh is a 52 years old female, born on Wednesday, 2nd of June 1971. She will turn 53 on June 02, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 24 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1938 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Danielle is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 26, 2000. Our records show Samer M Ojjeh (53) and Miriam Nora Ojjeh (22) as possible relatives.

Overview of Danielle J Ojjeh

Age: 52

Gender: female

Birth year: 1971

Lives in: Greenwich

Phone number: 203-861-5856

Danielle J Ojjeh's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 26, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Old Greenwich School

Voter ID: 002877199

Congressional District: 004

House District: 150

Senate District: 036

Danielle J Ojjeh Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Danielle J Ojjeh

16 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-0000
No known party affiliation
16 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1938
No known party affiliation
17 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1908
No known party affiliation
17 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1908
No known party affiliation
17 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1908
No known party affiliation
21 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1908
No known party affiliation
21 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1908
No known party affiliation
28 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1938
No known party affiliation
28 Hendrie Drive, Greenwich , Ct 06870-1938
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Danielle J Ojjeh's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Greenwich , Ct
Born on: Monday, 28th of September 1970
Gender: Male
Greenwich , Ct
Born on: Friday, 6th of April 2001
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $50,932

Net Worth: $897,887

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.