David T Weiss

Male, Age 60 Greenwich , Connecticut

David T Weiss is a 60 years old male, born on Tuesday, 16th of July 1963. He will turn 61 on July 16, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 53 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. David is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 4, 1992.

Overview of David T Weiss

Age: 60

Gender: male

Birth year: 1963

Lives in: Greenwich

David T Weiss's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 4, 1992

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 012

Polling place: North Mianus School

Voter ID: 002865614

Congressional District: 004

House District: 151

Senate District: 036

David T Weiss Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for David T Weiss

49 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
50 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1132
No known party affiliation
51 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
52 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1132
No known party affiliation
52 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1132
No known party affiliation
52 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1132
No known party affiliation
52 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1132
No known party affiliation
53 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
53 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
53 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
53 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
54 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1132
No known party affiliation
55 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
55 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation
55 Stirrup Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1133
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $98,226

Net Worth: $652,199

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.