Jinlu Wang

Male, Age 66 Shelton, Connecticut

Jinlu Wang is a 66 years old male, born on Friday, 4th of January 1957. He will turn 67 on January 04, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 17 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jinlu is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 4, 2000.

Overview of Jinlu Wang

Age: 66

Gender: male

Birth year: 1957

Lives in: Shelton

Phone number: 203-926-1328

Jinlu Wang's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 4, 2000

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Elizabeth Shelton School

Voter ID: 002860059

Congressional District: 004

House District: 113

Senate District: 021

Jinlu Wang Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jinlu Wang

9 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
9 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
12 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5914
No known party affiliation
12 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5914
No known party affiliation
13 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
13 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
13 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
17 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
18 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5914
No known party affiliation
18 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5914
No known party affiliation
21 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
21 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
21 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
21 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation
21 Captains Watch, Shelton, Ct 06484-5915
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $36,375

Net Worth: $1,003,294

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.