1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06484 Shelton
  4. Kings Highway Extension

Frank F Bures

Male, Age 68 Shelton, Connecticut

Frank F Bures is a 68 years old male, born on Thursday, 23rd of December 1954. He will turn 69 on December 23, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 23 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Frank is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 8, 1998.

Overview of Frank F Bures

Age: 68

Gender: male

Birth year: 1955

Lives in: Shelton

Phone number: 203-924-1492

Frank F Bures's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 8, 1998

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Shelton Intermediate School

Voter ID: 002841297

Congressional District: 004

House District: 113

Senate District: 021

Frank F Bures Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

23 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Frank F Bures

Dennis J Pierce(41)
3 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931
No known party affiliation
Edward Tou(48)
7 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931
No known party affiliation
Maureen A Tou(53)
7 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931
No known party affiliation
Gilda M Bures(62)
51 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931
No known party affiliation
Amanda W Bures(31)
51 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2928
No known party affiliation
John Bures(65)
51 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931
No known party affiliation
Mackenzie Bures(24)
51 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2928
No known party affiliation
Cody J Bures(38)
51 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 23 Kings Highway Extension, Shelton, Ct 06484-2931

Income

Salary: $80,658

Net Worth: $266,567

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.